Wednesday, 30 December 2015

Richard C. Hoagland and his fawning lickspittles.

Readers of this blog and others. Aimed at correcting the heinous crimes committed against science by Richard C. Hoagland and his gang of fake scientists will no doubt be aware just how indoctrinated the members of "Branch Hoaglandia" are.

Recently I have engaged in another attempt at educating these poor lost souls via a closed facebook group which is called "Richard C Hoagland." Astonishingly I have not been banned yet. As is wont to happen with these type of groups when any dissent from their blinkered views is put forth. I found it quite appalling just how ignorant of real science these people are. They absolutely suck up everything the Hoaxmeister says as gospel, and will simply refuse to read any explanation proving their Lord and Master wrong.

What a waste of fucking time. Or is it? Perhaps there are people who read but don't post. Perhaps these same people did actually take the time to read the links I provided exposing Hoagland's utter mendacity and disgraceful attempts at mathematics.

I found I had three main adversaries. First off, in chirped Hoagland's main bum chum Keith "good ole boy" Laney. Then came the other two. Let us just refer to them as Alan Fanboi, and Tony the Bigot.
Good ole boy of course still thinks the face on Mars is real. As do Fanboi and Bigot. In fact, Fanboi actually posted the 1976 image as proof. Refusing to believe (or more likely do the hard yards and fucking learn it for himself) all attempts at trying to explain what pixel size and resolution meant. Fanboi was backed up by Tony the Bigot early on. I had someone's attention for sure. Then the insults started.

Insulting any and all dissenters is standard practice for the Branch Hoaglandians. I am used to it. This was just more of the same. Originality has never occurred to people whose 1-inch thoughts dominate their paradigm. Fanboi tried to trick me into thinking he was actually reading my destruction of Hoagland's science. Trying to sound windswept, cryptic and interesting by posting two or three-word replies. I wasn't impressed. Fanboi is a believer. He cannot be saved. I did try. He simply refused to look at the evidence and shoved his fingers in his ears shouting LALALALA...NO YOU!!!!

Next up was Tony the Bigot. He was a little more verbose than Fanboi but no less ignorant. Even in the face (pun intended) of overwhelming evidence, Tony simply refused to contemplate Hoagland could possibly be wrong. Branch Hoaglandia indeed appears to have a "Scientology type" grip over it's disciples. Rather alarming don't you think. I was then labeled a paid shill. Fuck me, I've never heard that one before. NOT!

Lady Woo then posts about the Chinese lander. She is curious about the "numbers" associated with the landing site. I corrected her, stating that Hoaxmeister himself had stated 19.5 degrees North or South are important to his theory. I told her 19.5 degrees West does not count. Then it occurred to me just why she would make that association. Hoagland himself actually mentioned the 19.44 degrees West and said that the Chinese were sending messages to the elites about HD physics. More moving the goalposts by Hoagland. In chimes Alan Fanboi, posting old and discredited rubbish regarding Cydonia and Hoagland's made up numbers. It cited first off, Hoagland's disgraceful Explorer 1 mathematics. Explorer 1 was the main thrust of my attack on Hoagland's inability to do mathematics. Yet here we have a person using it as defence. Bad show Alan Fanboi. I knew you didn't do the work, and, probably didn't even read the links. Now that's a cult for you. No, I didn't misspell anything.

What's that coming over the hill? - Hooray, here comes Tony the Bigot to shove his tuppence in.
Tony takes umbrage that Lady Woo posted something praising the Chinese. In fact, when Tony the Bigot is taken to task for referring to the Chinese people as "animals" he ripostes by actually affirming that he did indeed intend to call them animals. But this time, attempts to temper his bigotry by replacing "Chinese" with "Red Chinese."

Good ole boy then compounds his lunacy by declaring that the Explorer 1 mistake was inconsequential and didn't matter. Fucking jeebuz. What a journey this was. I think I need a shower.

Update: I got banned. All posts removed. The usual behaviour of Hoagland's Stasi.


Tuesday, 22 December 2015

Sci-Fi movies as evidence my arse Hoagland.

I came across a blog post by Dr Joseph Farrell. An ex-friend of Hoagland. Farrell booted Hoagland's arse out of his circle of friends after the Hoaxmeister conned Farrell into appearing on a Camelot video round-table discussion about comet Elenin. Farrell, of course, excused himself early on as Hoagland immediately began his preen-fest of bullshit. I shall post a portion of it below. I wonder who the "diva" personality, or what absolute fucktard looks upon sci-fi novels as insider info. Pretty obvious really. This is Farrell having a real go at Hoagland and I am guessing Wilcock amongst others here.

The last year saw the alternative research community - what Mr. Henry calls the "truth community" - taking high dives off the cliffs into belly-flopping hysteria. We were treated to endless hype and the so-called testimony of "whistleblowers" - who must always remain anonymous of course, with little by way of corroboration from other sources to back any of it up.

But we have to ask ourselves why this is happening? Why the tailspin into endless speculations and apocalyptic scenarios, including replays of Hale-Bopp with Elenin, the reliance upon science fiction novels as "analysis", the heavy dose of alleged "whistleblower" testimony, the construction of macro-scenarios of apocalyptic "grandeur"(or perhaps better put of apocalyptic grandiosity)?

In his questioning of Mr. Maugans, William Henry elicited the response that Mr Maugans was connecting dots that would indicate that some of this, at least, is deliberate, suggesting that the aim is really to cast a pall of suspicion over anyone researching in the field. This, is, indeed, what has happened. 2011 saw a move within this "community';(and I hesitate even using that word in connection with alternative research) away from research and analysis, and toward rampant speculation and scenario construction, "whistleblower" testimony, and...well... what I like to call the "diva" personality, i.e., the reliance upon a kind of "capital" built up over the years to promote speculation whose acceptance is based upon the stature or standing individuals have or had within the "community."

Speculation is, of course, the name of the game within this whole field, nothing would get done without it. But there is a great deal of difference between speculation based on research, documents, reasoned argument, and so on, and that based upon a diva's reputation and hysterics and histrionics, whistleblowers, alleged threats, marketing schemes in conjunction with said threats, anecdotes, and so on.

The bottom line, for me, is this, and I have said it often before: "research" based upon whistleblowers, channeling, science fiction novels or Hollywood movies, dubious "word analysis", and all the other claptrap that one so often hears, is not research. One cannot footnote a whistleblower, a channeled source, and so on. These things may, from time to time, shed interesting light on an argument, or even connect an interesting dot or two, but in the final analysis, there is no substitute for real documentable sources, for reasoned speculation and argument. Let's hope that 2012 brings some sanity back to the field.

Wednesday, 9 December 2015

Hoagland, facebook suckers, and downright stupidity.



I find it frustrating and sad that some people can be so sucked in by Richard C. Hoagland's utter batshit crazy ideas, plain bad science, and atrocious mathematical errors yet will still fawn at his altar. Honestly, it's like Hoagland is running some kind of cult. Sadly I am not joking. See below for proof.


4 people like this.
Comments
Derek James Eunson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1rAiXrF0ck
Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara. Pseudoscientist liars. Anyone remember…
YOUTUBE.COM
Anthony D'Andrea Remember that name? For some reason Derek continues to pursue his vendetta against Hoagland, to discredit him, to distract from his messages, to do anything to prevent the truth from coming out.

He and other wackos like him need to learn that the cat is already out of the bag. While those not in bed with the cartels sometimes have to speculate about the final configuration of things or resort to guesswork at times, there is certainly enough proof out there to confirm that the government stories are bogus and there is an alternate view in the process of being formulated.

Hoagland may not always be right -- but he's a lot closer to the truth than the government's story -- and certainly a lot closer than paranoid skeptics like Derek ever want us to be.
Derek James Eunson Hoagland may not always be right?
Which one of these was wrong;
Elenin was a spaceship,
Phobos is a spaceship,
Comets Enke, Hale-Bopp, Hartley and 67/P are spaceships,
President Obama is the reincarnation of Horus?
Alan Abramowitz No one is always right.
LikeReply14 hrsEdited
Derek James Eunson Texas sharpshooter fallacy.
LikeReply15 hrs
Alan Abramowitz You repeat the same bulletpoints smile emoticon
LikeReply14 hrs
Alan Abramowitz That blog by binaryspellbook is so weak. I've made better negative analyses.
The ad homenin ending on what he expects was so immature. Yes we know he looks for arcologies but not no one has refuted him on that expectation of his nor conclusions.
LikeReply13 hrsEdited
Anthony D'Andrea Derek doesn't seek truth -- truth scares him. What he seeks is just attention.
LikeReply2 hrs
Derek James Eunson Phobos etc are not space stations. That is all I am saying.
LikeReply50 mins
Derek James Eunson Not a single member of Hoagland's congregation knows how to set up an experiment. Hoagland relies on this when he tries to use a 40-year-old wristwatch to measure torsion fields and convince us he is using the scientific method. Baselines and controls are PARAMOUNT. Hoagland has shown neither. Therefore, his torsion field experiments are worthless pretend-science.
LikeReply21 mins
Anthony D'Andrea Got to admire Derek for being consistent. Consistently ignorant, but consistent. First word in the title of the URL used to try to discredit Hoagland (Does Derek do anything else?) is "Pseudo". Do I even want to click on it?

I know this: NASA, or more specifically JPL, has been giving us bogus science for years. If it wasn't for Dr. Hoagland, we wouldn't be aware of any of it. I'm not qualified any more than Derek to say he's perfect or completely right or wrong -- but I know he's gotten the attention of the public onto some issues that are sorely in need of looking at. I thank him for that. And while I don't blindly accept everything said by ANYONE, when Hoagland speaks, he will have ,my ear, my respect and my appreciation.

LikeReply13 mins
Derek James Eunson Anthony.Two things. As an electronics engineer of 30+ years experience, I do know how to design an experiment. Richard Hoagland is not a Dr. He has no degree of any kind never mind a Ph.D. - In fact he has nothing more than a high school diploma.
LikeReply8 mins

Monday, 7 December 2015

Hoagland - "I am the only one who got it right."

Richard C. Hoagland our favourite polymath grandly announced on his internet radio show, "I was the only one who got it right." As readers of this and Expat's Emoluments of Mars blog will know, this is typical Hoagland bluster. But what was he claiming this time. He has claimed credit in the past for either discovering or designing; water on Mars, the ocean on Europa, water on the Moon, the Pioneer plaque, and of course, hyperdimensional physics.

It was none of the above. Hoagland was referring to the first ever images of Pluto's surface that arrived on Earth. Within ten fucking minutes, Hoagland was seeing arcologies hundreds of miles in scale that were, "obviously artificial." In the preen-fest that is his radio show Hoagland told his guest and audience, "I was the only one who got it right." - Whilst displaying such hubris is Hoagland's default persona. I still had to think of nice things to stop myself from throwing up. Men and women who worked ten or more years on the New Horizons mission simply discarded while Hoagland peacocks in front of them claiming credit for utterly bastardising and diminishing their hard work.

The latest images are quite simply astonishing. I wonder what lies Hoagland will vomit forth. It will, of course, be about arcologies and ancient space alien ancestors. He will see buildings and bridges and all his usual fluff. Keith Laney will no doubt be invited back as a guest. Laney is a likeable old codger. He really is but believes he sees the same shit as Hoagland in images. Below is an image which shows where the water-ice al-Idrisi mountains meet the nitrogen rich-ices of Sputnik Planum.

Image credit: NASA/JPL-JHU/SWRI


I'm waiting for Hoagland to refer to the "al-Idrisi mountains" on Pluto. You see "al-Idrisi" is almost an anagram of "Isis." - That is more than sufficient "data" for Hoagland to begin his monster extrapolations. Oh and there's more.....Enter Wiki.

Abu Abd Allah Muhammad al-Idrisi al-Qurtubi al-Hasani al-Sabti, or simply Al Idrisi /ælɪˈdriːsiː/, was a Muslim geographer, cartographer and Egyptologist.

Isis, Egyptologist.....<insert here "the model">





Friday, 20 November 2015

Hoagland and Bara. The man behind the bullshit exposed.

Hi Richard, Mike,

I hope you are aware of James Oberg's latest expose of your long time friend and colleague Ken Johnstone.

Expat has conveniently blogged the whole investigation for us to peruse at our leisure.

It makes some horrific reading. Poor Ken. In trying to legitimise himself, he has left the door open for some very interesting details to emerge. And I am not just talking about the phoney online Ph.D. he essentially awarded himself. No sirs, I am talking massive lies, monumental deceit, downright chicanery and sharp practice on Johnston's part. Much of it gleaned from FOIA requests.

Since Johnston is the linchpin of your Moon investigation, do you think that he should still be trusted. Do you feel comfortable basing decades of work on the reputation of a proven liar and trickster?

It is a long read, I admit. It is however thoroughly researched and detailed. I highly recommend both of you read it. Or you can do what pseudoscientists, con artists and hucksters usually do. Refuse to read the truth and instead simply state that the powers that be are trying to sully poor Ken's reputation. You know. The kind of thing you two pranksters do when you get caught out lying.

Like Richard did when I called him out on the torsion field investigation he was angling for in the Baltic sea. Simply by asking him how could he measure a torsion field from many metres deep. When he himself had stated that water is an excellent shield against torsion waves. I got some hand waving answer accusing me of not understanding shielding. Oh my how the engineer laughed at that one.

Then we had Mike stating that light travels all the way to the floor of our deep oceans before being reflected back into space. Hence, the ocean appears darker from space than the clouds do. Oh my fucking god. This is wrong in at least 4 different ways. It is not even wrong it's so bad. I've yet to hear Mike try and wriggle out of that laughable error. That will be fun if he ever does. I remember Mike saying, "I never said that" on many occasions. Even when being quoted verbatim from one of his own books.

Kindest Regards
DJE

Wednesday, 18 November 2015

Hoagland denies being in jail for fraud.

Dear Producer,

On OSOM open lines, Hoagland was asked if he had ever done any jail time. He denied this immediately. I was curious and now find that his first ever publisher and indeed the publisher of the last book Hoagland contributed to states that Hoagland actually did spend time in LA county jail.
The source article by Grossinger is linked here. Scroll to around 1/3 way down the page.


"Hoagland actually wrote much of Monuments in LA County jail. He never should have been there, but a silly mistake, a bureaucratic oversight, in New York followed by a corrupt attorney in California apparently landed him there. As the story goes, the warden liked the Martian concept enough that he let Dick use the facility computer to work on the project (while he also wrote the kitchen manual for staff use).  In fact, once the warden got wind of the gist of his inmate’s project, he became a great supporter and encouraged his “charge from Mars” to broadcast installments of Monuments to the prison at large over the loudspeaker at night.

Bored, surly males awaited their amusement at the bewitching hour, ever in suspense for the next phase of the tale of the unknown aliens and their Martian city.  I don’t know if they laughed or cried, or even if this actually happened but, if it did, the book’s original captive audience was  a Dickens-like fan club hearkening to the nineteenth century.

Hoagland is a unique mixture of amateur scientist, genius inventor, scam artist, and performer, blending true, legitimate speculative science with his own extrapolations, tall tales, and inflations.  He is a brilliant and glorious myth-maker and a evidence-based scientist at the same.  The Face on Mars is powerful speculative science in an exobiological, archaeo-astronomical context virtually unexplored before him."

Further research indicated Hoagland was jailed for the theft of a rental car and misuse of a planetarium credit card. I cannot however substantiate that as fact.

Would you ask Richard to address his jail time and set the record straight on air.

Kindest Regards
Derek James Eunson

Friday, 13 November 2015

Mike Bara - Dunderhead at large

Mike Bara, world famous misogynist, thug, homophobe and hater, is at it again. As Expat pointed out on his blog Mikey boy thinks the EM Drive violates relativity. What a fucking dickhead I hear you say. He couldn't have said that. Well, I am afraid he did. Not that having his horrible errors read out to him from one of his own books has ever stopped Lard Bottom from saying, "I never said that."

So sayeth Mike "Cartman" Bara.

Hi Mike,

I see you have been making an arse of yourself yet again on Twitter when you wrote this.....

"This doesn't "defy the Laws of physics." Relativity and Einstein are simply wrong."

You then try and plug your awful error-laden book The Choice. Don't you get it Michael, the EM drive violates Newtonian physics not Einsteinian. If you actually understood physics you would realise that. I always knew you were a dunce. But man, this really takes the biscuit.

Are you going to try your usual stance when you get caught making shit up and resort to, "I never said that." - Well yes you did say that Mike, and it's still on twitter.

Why are you not getting an invite to Hoagland's show. It would make great radio listening to the pair of you trying to out-bullshit one another. Or perhaps you two still aren't talking after you ripping off Hoagland's work and writing the same book 4 times with it.

I also heard you once again when interviewed state that Sitchin channelled his books directly from the Annunaki. Yet you still claim he was a scholar of ancient texts. Make your mind up Mike. Sitchin was either the great scholar your earlier interviews claim, or he was a batshit crazy old fuck who conned a whole slew of people (including you) out of money while he skipped to the bank.

Kindest Regards
DJE

Monday, 9 November 2015

Hoagland self destructs on air.


Well folks, it had to happen. Hoagland's monster ego surfaces and kills any chance he had of making decent radio. The scenario is quite simple. Hoagland gets a producer recommended by Art Bell. Rossy (the aforementioned producer) keeps the Hoagland ego in place albeit temporarily and books some engaging guests. Hoagland surprises everyone by turning out to be a decent interviewer. He then tells his producer that it is not ok to hang up on Hoagland to take a call from his Mother. Because Hoagland now owns his life and nobody (even his Mother) should be put before Hoagland. Rossy (who Hoagland refused to pay) then quit. Hoagland goes into meltdown...............




Hi Richard,

Nobody believes for one minute that you tried an experiment. This was a full on attempt at fooling your audience. Tim Russ will be ashamed when he finds out you tried to pass off his interview as being new. Even going to the lengths of splicing in a new introduction and news segment. Just wow.

Not too fond of being referred to as the peanut gallery either. With all the vile connotations that entails. Useless eaters too Richard. Man you've lost the plot, and quite possibly the radio gig.
As one person said. Who would have guessed the easiest way for Hoagland to self destruct was to give him everything he wanted.

A great producer in Rossy, Art Bell lending expertise and getting you a loan of expensive gear. Then we find out that you told Rossy (your then producer) that he was wrong to hang up on you so he could take a call from his Mother. That you were more important than his family and that you now own his life.

Now Art Bell is royally ticked off at you because of your lies and downright egomaniacal behaviour. Way to go Richard, alienate everyone, even the ones who were wont to give you a chance to be a decent host. There is more on this debacle to come. I am sure much will soon be revealed. I shall attach a PDF for your perusal. Not that I think your unwarranted monster ego will allow whatever sliver of decency is left in you to care.

I doubt you missed this post from Art Bell. But just in case you did. I quote him verbatim below.

"I guess I need to say something about the email and messages I have been getting about RCH. I did everything I could to help him in every way possible, including getting a loan of expensive gear from Telos to transmit his show to the Network. I found Rossy for him. I gave him the best advice I could muster up on how to proceed. I provided help in more ways then I will try to detail here.
I am sad that events have unfolded as they have. I am not going to discuss specifics but will say that we are currently not in communication nor have we been for some time now. Sometimes you think you know somebody and then find out you never really did, just sad. Please understand that I do not run the Network, I just do my show.

Art"

*ps* The PDF in this case will link to my public dropbox where the file is located.

Kindest Regards
DJE


Monday, 7 September 2015

Pot kettle black and Bara


Such wisdom from the portly one. He should perhaps take his own advice. How many times have we heard Mike say that lunar glass was twice as strong as steel. How often have we heard Mike claim that he is confident he can prove there are no such things as the laws of physics. How many times have we heard Mikey boy say he has debated and beaten NASA's best Ph.D's.

The wisdom of  Mike Cartman Bara.

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

Douglas Dietrich

Never heard of him?
Neither had I until I heard him referenced by Gene and Chris at the paracast forum. I see now what they were talking about. This guy is utterly fucking batshit off his rocker. Almost as bad as Kerry Cassidy. Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara would be impressed by this nutcase and his bullshit capabilities.


Wednesday, 5 August 2015

Richard C. Hoagland challenges Richard Dolan live on air.

Anyone remember the Elenin fiasco?

Of course you do. Where Hoagland made the claim that Comet Elenin was a spacecraft sent by the Shem Su Hor (followers of Horus from ancient Egyptian mythology) who apparently are still alive and well today. In fact according to Hoagland Barack Obama is a member. The painful, almost four hour long video of Hoagland claiming such shite is still available on YouTube.

Many people (including myself) were all over Hoagland like a bad suit destroying his mathematics. I and others noted for example a division by zero possibility in his made up equation. This destroyed his entire "model."

Apparently he still believes he was right. Everyone else is wrong. Richard Dolan is challenged live on air to debate. Dr Stuart Robbins blogged an absolute nuke regarding Elenin.

In the below audio clip we hear the challenge being issued.